Daisypath - Personal pictureDaisypath Vacation tickers

Saturday, December 3

A Note of Thanks To The Woman Who Recorded Jennifer Boyle at Michels.

Some Black Protesters Could Learn A Lot From This White Woman.

A lot has been said about this woman Jennifer Boyle, about her racism, her  insensitivity, her out of her head rants at both Michels and Peet's Coffee.  She's been splashed all over social media, and millions of people have spent so many incalculable minutes of their valuable time discussing her and her antics that there isn't really anything new to be said about her....
What I want to say is to the woman who recorded this video. THANK YOU. Our society has become so apathetic and uncaring that most people would have just shaken their heads and walked by. If anyone did record it, it would have been for the shock value, or for the notoriety they could get among their peers. Listening to the conversation when she approached you, no one would have ever known that you were just an ordinary shopper, out with your child doing some shopping. For the most part you did not take sides other than to tell her she needed help for her ranting and raving manner; even when she accused your child of stealing and you of having a "husband who's cheating on you" and of having "a pathetic life" you remained calm, and continued to record. You didn't get into a debate with her (as the manager spent about 8 minutes doing, to no avail) or get outwardly angry and start yelling at her, you very calmly continued to record her antics, even when she claimed to be recording your child (which I don't believe she did.)

A lot of people watching that video probably jumped up at that point and exclaimed loudly what they 'would have done' if it had been them; they would have  hit her, or told her off, or "slapped the  *^#@  phone out of her hand" (an actual quote from someone I know!) , and there are those who would have done exactly that. What good would it have done though? We saw what the manager accomplished.  (Nothing.) For every reasonable, logical thing the manager said, Boyle came back with more nonsense.  If someone (say you, the video recorder) had hit or, or cursed at her, or damaged her phone, at the very least you would have become embroiled in that woman's fantasy of discrimination at the hands of all non-Trump supporters,  at the very worst you would have been arrested and charged with assault, which there would have been video of, so you would have been found guilty and would have a record. Besides which, your child would have had to suffer watching mommy get taken away by the police.  Not cool....

It's my personal opinion of course, but I think you did exactly the right thing.  You stood up for what was right (by making a video of as much as you could) you didn't back down when she came over to you, and you didn't inflame the situation any further by overreacting to her. She spent a couple of minutes trying to goad you into doing something, then moved away to look for other 'prey'.  You and your child were still there, not in jail, not bruised, and still recording. I understood the shaking afterwards. Don't worry about it, being that close to that much hate and/or insanity can do that to you.

I think all the rioters and looters and violent protesters out here could learn a lot from you. If you give the enemy a reason to focus on you, your cause is lost and forgotten, i.e. if you had screamed or cursed at her, the fact that the video was about her behavior would have been lost. It would have become all about you and how you behaved. As it was, I got a very clear picture of her and what she was doing, and how uncalled for it was.  This is what's happened with BLM; everyone has become so riled up about some of the protesters' behavior that what they are protesting, the original basis for BLM, has been pushed aside.

For me, your video was about much more than the wild raving of some woman. It clearly showed the difference between Trump supporters and non-supporters, and validated some of what so many have said about the upcoming administration.

Thank you.

*The opinions expressed in this blog are those of its author only, and in no way represent Blogger, Google, or any other entity.

Wednesday, November 2

This Is What They Think Of Us! Don't Let Them Get Away With It!!

Trump of course is saying that he wants no part of an endorsement from the Klan, but doesn't he believe the same things they do about black people? Haven't we heard him saying derogatory things about blacks in the ghetto, etc.? 
Please,  to all my brothers and sisters, (no matter what color you are) don't let the Klan and Trump get away with this!  Show them that "40s and Weed" will not keep us from going to the polls and making sure that ego-maniacal, women-groping, foul-mouthed Republican does NOT become the leader of this country.

White Nationalists Plan to Suppress Black Voters With ‘40s and Weed’: Report

Amid Donald Trump’s cries that the presidential election is rigged, the KKK and neo-Nazi organizations are reportedly working to suppress the African-American vote.


Members of the Fraternal White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan in 2009

On Tuesday, The Crusader, a newspaper affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, endorsed Trump, who allegedly found the endorsement “repulsive.” Now a neo-Nazi leader has told Politico that he and his associates are planning to hand out marijuana and 40-ounce malt liquor in the “ghettos” of Philadelphia to encourage black voters to stay home.
According to Politico, the National Socialist Movement, the Ku Klux Klan and the white nationalist American Freedom Party are monitoring polls amid Trump’s claims that the election is rigged.
“The possibility of violence on or around Election Day is very real,” Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law Center told Politico. “Donald Trump has been telling his supporters for weeks and weeks and weeks now that they are about to have the election stolen from them by evil forces on behalf of the elites.”
Potok added that intimidating efforts could actually work against Trump.
“If, on the morning of Election Day, it turns out that we have white supremacists standing around looking threatening at polling places, I think it would arouse anger,” he said. “People would vote just to prove they’re not being intimidated by these radical racists.”
But intimidation isn’t the only method Trump supporters plan to use. Apparently all black voters need not to vote is weed and 40s.
“We also have some teams going in to the ghettos in Philly with 40s and weed to give out to the local residents, which we think will lead to more of them staying home. We have had success with this in the past,” wrote an unnamed representative of the right-wing website
Politico added that it could not independently verify the claim that this “method” of black-voter suppression has worked in the past.
Read more at Politico.

Not As Morbid or Tragic As Usual, but Very Serious Nonetheless

When I turned my computer on, and opened my homepage, the first thing I saw was this:

FBI agents knew of Clinton-related emails weeks before director was briefed
Agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server knew early this month that new messages had been uncovered that might be relevant to their case. FBI Director James B. Comey, seen here, has said he was told of the development Thursday. 

      With all that we have riding on this election, and the importance of getting  those we know to get out and vote for someone,  are we really concerned with some emails, and policies and procedures??? All of the space that's been used to  vilify Hilary in the newspapers and magazines, all the time  spent on her by TV news anchors and  camera crews, not to mention all the time her opponent, Donald Trump, spends talking about sending her to jail,  and all of it for what?  None of it has anything to do with the issues facing this country today, or explains how either one is planning to solve the problems! IMO, unless they find an email which states something about using the private mail server to hide something (i.e. "Dear So-and-So,  I have something to discuss with you, but first I want to assure you that you don't have to worry about speaking freely. I'm using a private email server,  not my government server." Then I'd say we have something to talk about, something to worry about!  Anybody seen anything like that, or heard anything close to that?And I'm NOT talking about the stuff coming out of the Trump camp or the Republican Party! The answer is a loud, resounding, No!!!

The above was written on Sunday; I wasn't able to finish because something came up.  Now today, (Tuesday) I see this article* on an ABC News website:

FBI agents Investigation Into Hilary Clinton Back On

FBI Director James Comey released a statement today* saying that the FBI is going to continue the previously closed investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails from her time as secretary of state.
"In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation," Comey wrote in a letter released today.
Comey wrote in the letter that after being briefed on the unrelated case, he agreed, "the FBI should take appropriated investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation."
Of course the news media is all over this, claiming that the FBI director must have evidence of a crime committed by the Clintons, and that's why they are reopening the investigation. What they have not made clear in these reports is that this is NOT the same investigation as before! As a matter of fact, it is not because of Hilary that the investigation was reopened! 
(* article is from October 29, 2016)
Here's a bit of an article from the New York Times:

Mr. Weiner, who lost his seat in Congress and his mayoral hopes after repeated episodes in which he sent lewd messages to women, is now under federal investigation for allegedly sending sexual messages to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina. In that inquiry, the F.B.I. this month seized a laptop that contained thousands of messages belonging to Ms. Abedin, a top aide to Mrs. Clinton.

Huma Abedin
The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, told Congress on Friday that investigators will now review those messages for possible relevance to the Clinton inquiry, news that rattled the Clinton campaign and stung her supporters.
Anthony Weiner
             You can read the entire article here.
Huma Abedin is one of Hilary Clinton's top aides, so close that she has been referred to as Clinton's  "Shadow".  Anthony Weiner's laptop and the investigation into his 'habit'  of sexting women is what has sparked this new topic of debate. As a matter of fact, His latest scandal to become public is his sexting  a 15 year old girl. During the investigation into that, it came out that there were hundreds of emails purportedly from Clinton's private server.

To me, this is nothing but another attempt to discredit Clinton and thwart her at the polls.  He has already said that she would not be charged, and the whole thing was squashed.  Even if this were a legitimate attempt to find wrongdoing, why was it so important to announce it now, before even completing the review of the emails? At this point they have no idea if there is anything in those emails that could possibly be incriminating to Clinton, so why the rush?

One thing I'm really curious about, why has the FBI  neglected to mention anything about Trump's alleged connections to an alleged Russian plot to usurp our election?

FBI agents  A Veteran Spy  Has Given the FBI Information Alleging 
Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump 
From an article in  Mother Jones::
On Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid upped the ante. He sent Comey a fiery letter    saying the FBI chief may have broken the law and pointed to a potentially greater controversy: "In my communications with you and other top officials in the national security community, it has become clear that you possess explosive information about close ties and coordination between Donald Trump, his top advisors{sic}, and the Russian government…The public has a right to know this information."

(You can read the entire article here.)

Why hasn't that been mentioned? Why hasn't the FBI Director made a big  announcement, or written a letter about that? 

This election has been the worst I have seen in the 39 years I've been of voting age.  It is the perfect example of  dirty campaigns run in dark backrooms by men in dark suits hunched over a table smoking cigars and glaring at each other as they gesticulate wildly. These campaigns have fit the stereotype that you always see on television and in movies, where someone is paid off to do something dirty and underhanded. It's  beginning to seem as if there is no reason to vote, not for these two candidates  at least.

There ARE OTHER CANDIDATES though! You don't have to settle for one of the big two, please get out  and vote for someone! Don't  let the Republicans  undo all the work that Obama has done! 

Saturday, October 22

The Tragic Death of Deborah Danner, Age 66

Here's  a fatal shooting with a twist; no longer is it just young black males who've been stopped for something.
The officer who shot the victim is Sgt. Hugh Barry, an 8 year veteran of the NYPD. The victim is Deborah Danner, a mentally ill woman  that the police were already aware of from having had calls about her before. At the time of this article, the names were not being released, but have been since then.
Why didn't he just use his Taser on her? Initially she had a scissors, which in my mind would be a lot more dangerous than a bat, and he was able to talk her into putting it down. Then she picks up a bat and swings so he shoots her? What imminent danger was he in? Here we have a trained police officer up against a mentally ill but still able to be talked to 66 year old woman;  he couldn't  just grab the bat from her? Oh no, that's right, he had to hold on to his gun with one hand, after all, he was in fear for his life from this woman that he had just talked into putting down the scissors!

Police Cite Self-Defense as Sergeant Fatally Shoots Bronx Woman, 66

picture of mentally ill black woman fatally shot by police officer
Deborah Danner
A police sergeant responding to a call about a 66-year-old woman acting irrationally in a Bronx apartment fatally shot her after she tried to hit him with a baseball bat on Tuesday, the police said.
Officers went to a seventh-floor apartment at 630 Pugsley Avenue in the Castle Hill neighborhood a little after 6 p.m. in response to a neighbor’s complaint, the police said.
About 10 minutes later, the sergeant entered the apartment and found the woman, who was alone, in a bedroom holding a pair of scissors, Assistant Chief Larry W. Nikunen, commanding officer of patrol for the Bronx, said at a news conference.
The sergeant persuaded the woman to drop the scissors, but she then grabbed a baseball bat. As she tried to hit him, the sergeant fired twice and struck her in the torso, Chief Nikunen said. She was pronounced dead at Jacobi Medical Center.
The chief said there had been “several incidents involving this individual with similar types of calls” in the past, but he did not have details of the previous calls.
The names of the sergeant, whom Chief Nikunen said was an eight-year veteran of the New York Police Department, and the woman were not released. The chief said the sergeant had a Taser, which was not used. Why it was not used will be part of an investigation.
In a statement, the Bronx borough president, Ruben Diaz Jr., called the shooting “an outrage,” noting that the police were aware of the woman’s history and that the sergeant had a stun gun. He called on Eric T. Schneiderman, the state attorney general, and Darcel D. Clark, the Bronx district attorney, to investigate.
“While I certainly understand the hard work that our police officers undertake to keep the streets of our city safe every single day, I also know what excessive force looks like,” Mr. Diaz said in the statement.

Saturday, October 8

Now, Let's See What Happens to This Parent...

There  have been many cases of parents accidentally leaving a young child  in a hot car for several hours, only to return and find the child either unconscious or already dead.  In each case that I can recall, the parent who had been responsible for leaving the child was always arrested, jailed, and prosecuted. I wonder if it will be the same in this case...

3-Year-Old Daughter of Miss. Police Officer Dies After Being Left in Patrol Car

The Long Beach, Miss., Board of Aldermen voted unanimously to fire Police Officers Cassie Barker and Clark Ladner. Barker's daughter died after being left alone in a patrol car for four hours.
Long Beach, Miss., Police Officer Cassie Barker with her daughter Cheyenn                                                FACEBOOK
The Board of Aldermen of the city of Long Beach, Miss., voted unanimously Tuesday to fire two police officers involved in the hot-car death of the 3-year-old daughter of one of the officers, the Sun Herald reports.
Initially, the officers were placed on paid leave pending the outcome of an investigation into the death of 3-year-old Cheyenn Hyer, daughter of Police Officer Cassie Barker, the Sun Herald reports.
However, the board decided to terminate Barker as well as Police Sgt. Clark Ladner, per the recommendation of Police Chief Wayne McDowell.
Barker’s daughter Cheyenn died Friday after being left alone in a patrol car, according to the report. Hancock County Sheriff Ricky Adam said the patrol car was running with the air conditioner on when investigators got to the scene. Cheyenn (some news organizations are spelling her name as Cheyenne) was left unattended in the car for four hours while Barker “was visiting” Ladner, authorities said. Both officers were off-duty at the time Cheyenn was found.
Temperatures at the time of the incident were in the high 80s to low 90s, with the heat index reaching more than 100 degrees.
Adam said that an arrest could follow once investigators obtain additional information. Investigators are working to determine whether criminal charges will be filed in the case. Chief Deputy Don Bass said Ladner did not know that Cheyenn was in the car while he and Barker were inside.
Barker will have 10 days to file an appeal with the Civil Service Commission regarding her firing, the Sun Herald notes.
On Monday, Chief Investigator Glen Grannan revealed that deputies learned that Barker had also been involved in an unrelated incident that resulted in her having to go through the state Department of Human Services “so she could have her child back,” the Sun Herald reports. That incident also involved Cheyenn.
“I’ve spoken with the male officer involved, but I’ve not spoken with the female officer, not as far as the official internal investigation, because of medical reasons,” Long Beach Police Chief Wayne McDowell said. “The mother is in shock. I will talk to her soon.”
Read more at the Sun Herald. 

Sunday, October 2

And Now The Truth Comes Out!!

New Video Reveals Sacramento, Calif., Police Tried To Run Over Black Man Before Fatally Shooting Him

The disturbing incident—even condemned by one of the officer’s brothers—was apparently even worse than initially thought, as departmental video shows that the officers tried to run Joseph Mann over twice.

According to recently released dash-cam video from a July altercation, two Sacramento, Calif., police officers attempted to run over an African-American homeless man—twice—before they shot and killed him in a hail of bullets.
The Sacremento Bee reports that one of the officers says “f–k this guy” in the final minute before they shot Joseph Mann. Moments later, the driver says, “I’m going to hit him.”
“OK. Go for it. Go for it,” his partner responds.
The Bee reports that Officers Randy Lozoya and John Tennis gunned their vehicle toward Mann during the July 11 incident, backed up, turned and then drove toward him again, based on dashcam video released by police. They stopped the car, ran toward Mann on foot and shot him 14 times. He was obviously running away from them.
After a private citizen gave news outlets video from the incident, police released dashcam video on Sept. 20 and called a news conference that day.
The Sacramento News and Review reports that the videos seem to contradict the department’s initial statement that its officers resorted to lethal force only after de-escalation tactics failed.
Lozoya and Tennis are currently on “modified duty,” according to a police spokesman.
Dispatchers told officers that Mann was seen with a knife and a gun. Police have never reported finding a gun.
In the dashcam video from the car used by Lozoya and Tennis, the officers attempt to hit Mann as he crosses a side street but miss him. The car screeches, reverses and then turns onto a street to continue the pursuit.
In the next audible clip, an officer says, “We’ll get him. We’ll get him.” They stop the car, exit and then chase Mann on foot.
Seconds later, they fired 18 shots at Mann, hitting him with 14. Their gunfire is heard on the dashcam video.
A toxicology report found methamphetamine in Mann’s system.
The Sacramento City Council will propose a use-of-force policy designed to restrict lethal force to be debated on Oct. 13. Other council members are calling for quicker release of video in police shootings, greater powers for a civilian oversight commission and other reforms.
“They are officers that shouldn’t be in uniform,” said Robert Mann, Joseph Mann’s brother, according to the Bee. “If this is their state of mind when they go to work, this doesn’t serve anyone well.”
Both officers are named as defendants in a federal lawsuit filed last month against the city by Mann’s relatives, according to the Sacramento News and Review. The lawsuit  says Mann displayed “overt signs of being in the midst of mental crisis” and officers should not have used lethal force—including a car—against him.
The Bee notes that the incident occurred four days after a sniper shot five police officers during a Black Lives Matter demonstration in Dallas.

Thursday, September 29

Graphic Body-Cam Footage Shows La. Cops Fatally Shoot 6-Year-Old Autistic Boy

     This one really surprises me, I don't recall ever hearing about it.  IMO, it ranks right up at the top of the list of  police-involved shooting deaths for being totally unnecessary.

     During the summer I wrote a post in which I highlighted the difference between what children used to be taught  about police officers and the new lessons they're learning now.  In that post I said that
it's not a racial divide for the most part, although it can be seen as a color divide. The colors aren't the expected black vs white though, the colors are blue vs all the colors of the rainbow."
 This story shows that more clearly than just talking about it. (You can read the post here.)

Graphic Body-Cam Footage Shows La. Cops Fatally Shoot 6-Year-Old Autistic Boy

     A Louisiana court released footage from November that shows now-former Officers Derrick Stafford, 33, and Norris Greenhouse Jr., 24, open fire on Christopher Few’s SUV, apparently unaware that Few’s 6-year-old son was in the car.

     On Wednesday a Louisiana court released body-camera footage of the fatal shooting of a 6-year-old autistic boy.

     According to CNN, Jeremy Mardis was riding with his father, Christopher Few, in November 2015 when Marksville, La., police attempted to pull him over. The officers, Derrick Stafford, 33, and Norris Greenhouse Jr., 24, claimed that they were attempting to stop Few to serve a warrant, although no warrants were ever issued for Few.
       Few reportedly refused to stop, and the officers gave chase. Officers claimed that the shooting occurred after Few rammed their squad car and was attempting to ram it again. Body-cam footage of the incident appears to show that Few’s car was stopped and his hands were raised when officers began firing on his SUV.
     “I dare say it was not even close to being used as a deadly weapon at that time,” U.S. District Court Judge William Bennett said after releasing the video.
Norris Greenhouse Jr.; Derrick Stafford ex-Louisiana State Police

     Stafford and Greenhouse were both charged with murder last year.
     The video, which is graphic, is about 14 minutes long and includes about a minute of the shooting. The video shows the officers realizing that a kid was in the car. It shows the officers checking the boy’s lifeless body; the video also shows both officers grieving when they learned that a child was in the car. Few was critically wounded.
     CNN notes that some 14 shell casings were found on the scene, and the three bullet fragments found in Mardis’ body all came from Stafford’s gun.
     Prosecutors claim that the footage supports their point that both officers have a history of excessive violence. They note several times when both officers used a stun gun unnecessarily, and in one case Stafford reportedly broke a 16-year-old girl’s arm while breaking up a schoolyard fight, the New York Daily News reports.
     Megan Dixon, Few’s fiancee, told The Advocate last year that Few and Greenhouse had a run-in after the former officer reportedly messaged Dixon on Facebook and visited her home.
     Both officers are currently free on bond. Stafford will face trial in November, according to CNN, while Greenhouse will not go to trial until March 2017.

Tuesday, September 27

Young Girl Makes Tearful Plea At Charlotte City Council Meeting - Kleenex Alert!!

Do we want our children having dreams at night about burying their parent/sibling/cousin/grandparent? Children are more intelligent than we give them credit for. We can only tell fairy tales about their relatives being up in heaven for so long; eventually they're going to ask us why so many people they know are going to heaven. Why are the police shooting so many of their friends' parents/siblings/cousins/grandparents? 

What are we going to tell them?

*I've heard it said about this video that the speech was rehearsed...perhaps it was, but the  tears weren't. 

Monday, September 26

Evidence That What Seems To Be A Double Standard Is Employed, Even When You Think It's Not

This is an old incident (June 2016) but I am just finding out about it, and I felt I had to use it to make a point. 
      A lot of people have probably used this case as 'evidence' that it is not only black males whose rights are being violated by the police department. They probably argued that it's not a color issue at all,  that it is simply young men who do not obey police commands and who  assault the police. (I saw a phrase something like that posted yesterday as a comment.) I almost thought the same thing myself when I first saw it.  After thinking about it for a few minutes, and rereading it, I realized something. I''m not going to tell  you just yet what it was; I'm going to post the story and let you watch the video, and let you draw your own conclusions.
Video of Mo. Cop Using Taser on Teen for Over 20 Seconds Released
     On Monday a federal judge released the police dashcam video showing a now-former Independence, Mo., police officer using excessive force during the 2014 traffic-stop arrest of then-17-year-old Bryce Masters, the Kansas City Star reports.
     The video of the Sept. 14, 2014, arrest shows then-Officer Timothy N. Runnels using a stun gun on Bryce for more than 20 seconds before dropping the handcuffed teen onto the pavement. Bryce ultimately went into cardiac arrest as a result of the use of force, which led to oxygen deprivation and brain damage.

According to the Kansas City Star, the teen, then a Truman High School senior, almost died.

    Runnels was sentenced to four years in federal prison last week for violating the teen’s civil rights. The video was played during his sentencing hearing. (I could not copy the video, but you can view it here.)
     It was determined that Runnels made the traffic stop because of a Kansas City warrant associated with the license plate on the vehicle that the teen was driving. The warrant was later found to be a mistake.
     A few minutes after deploying the stun gun, Runnels called for an ambulance but reportedly did not check on the teen. By the time the ambulance arrived, Masters was in cardiac arrest. He had to be put into a medically induced coma.
     The brain damage the teen suffered could impact the rest of his life. He recently testified that he is often forgetful and has difficulty focusing.

Read more at the Kansas City Star

     If you watched the video you saw that this teen was.....white! Can this be true? They treat white boys the same as they treat black ones? Isn't that interesting.
     But wait a minute. At one point in the story it said that the officer involved was sentenced to 4 years in  federal prison for violating the teen's civil rights. Now that's something, an officer is actually being punished for his crime!  But the victim didn't even die! How is it that so many have died and the officers walked away scot free, but this time the officer is punished? Could it be that the racial "double standard"  is alive and well and working in this case?  Think about it; obviously the officer did something wrong which was proven on the videotape.  How many videotapes have we looked at where blacks lost their lives when there was no justification for the shooting? In this case,  the victim's civil rights were violated, so the officer was charged. How many cases of civil rights violations as well  as manslaughter have we seen, and the officer was charged? Now, this officer was sentenced to four years in federal prison. How many of the officers in those other cases were even found guilty, let alone sentenced to federal prison??

Justice sure seems to be blind, doesn't she? Or maybe she's just colorblind...

Sunday, September 25

Black Lives Matter, and the Black Policeman Who Filed A Lawsuit Against Obama and Clinton

    Since the last post I've been thinking about what to post next. Sorry I haven't been updating like I should, it's just that it's become so hard to hear/read about the latest killings, and not run out and join the nearest Black Lives Matter chapter.  I usually describe myself as an activist... some family members consider me 'revolutionary' and 'rebellious'. (I'm sure if I told them that I'd ever considered joining BLM that would cement their belief about me.) If being sick and tired, not only of black men and women being killed like it's a game, but of the feelings of  helplessness  and despair; if wanting to do something to stop it makes me 'rebellious', then  I'm just going to have to accept that title and wear it with PRIDE!  I don't want to just sit around and commiserate with others about how sad it all is, and then go back to life as usual as if nothing's happened!! It really makes me sick to my stomach to see so many brothers and sisters  just brush it off as if it has nothing to do with them!  No one is going to come along and fight this battle for you ladies and gentlemen, if we don't fight for ourselves and each other, like our ancestors did during the slavery era,  and during the Civil Rights era, then our race is going to be wiped out, either by assimilation or assassination!! It's great to see whites being a part of BLM protests, as they have been over recent shootings, but they're not the ones that NEED to be doing the fighting! At the end of the day, they're going back to suburbia with their big homes  and fancy cars, while we catch the Metro home to our row-houses and apartments. We're the ones who will be left when the police start knocking on the doors in the wee hours of the morning talking about "We have a description of someone...", or "We got an anonymous tip...".  The white folks (and not by their own doing) will all be home chillin'...
white BLM UK protesters
     Read the full story here  about the BLM-UK protesters in London.  It's not the protesters' fault that they were allowed to go free with only what would be, in our country, suspended sentences. It just shows that the attitudes there are very similar to the ones here. What would have happened to nine black people who shut down the airport and made them cancel 160 flights??

     It can be really difficult to want to keep fighting when there are so many people of color who are either apathetic about the situation (since it doesn't affect them) or who completely disagree with BLM and insist that the charge of racism is false, and that the police are only 'doing their jobs' when they shoot unarmed black men  whose vehicle has broken down in the street.   (Read the story of Terence Crutcher here. WARNING: The videos are graphic and disturbing.)

     The absolute worst of these black people (IMO) are the ones who are cops themselves. How do they deal  with having other black people die all around them, knowing that a lot of them are not  justified shootings, and then having to watch the shooter just walk away? I'll show you how one deals with it...

Dallas Police Sgt. Demetrick Pennie Accuses Black Lives Matter and President Barack Obama
               of Inciting Race War and Files Lawsuit!!!

Yes folks, you read it here. A black police sergeant in Dallas has filed a multi-million dollar lawsuit against BLM and against the President of the United States. What do you want to bet he's a Republican? I mean hey, it was Fox News that reported this!

 Here's a little blurb from the story(You can read  it all here.):  

     Demetrick Pennie, a 17-year veteran and the president of the Dallas Fallen Officer Foundation, filed the complaint in federal court Friday, naming Black Lives Matter and public figures such as the Rev. Al Sharpton, the New Black Panther Party, and even President Barack Obama and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton as defendants.

     Yes, President Obama, the first black president, and Hilary Clinton, wife of the white president who was considered an 'honorary black man'(Read Toni Morrison's description in The New Yorker magazine of 1998;  it's the 9th paragraph at this link.) are in cahoots to incite their supporters to violence against the police.  Any violence perpetuated against the police of course has nothing to do with the blacks being killed by them, it's all Obama and Clinton's fault.

     I've seen a lot of trivial lawsuits in my time, but to ask for $500 million to $1.5 billion  because the president and the presidential nominee have incited the public to violence? I'm not only smh"ing, I'm lol'ing as well!! If a black man ever wanted to make himself  look ridiculous and like a pawn of the white man, this guy has done it (excuse the pun, it wasn't intended) IN SPADES! 

     I wish I could go to sleep, and wake up in the morning only to find that all of this has been a bad dream; the deaths of all those people in suspicious circumstances at the hands of the police, as well as the shooting deaths of the police in Dallas; all the protests and the marches, even the campaign of Donald Trump for president (now that is someone who has incited some violence!), I just wish it would all go away.  One thing at least that we can do, is keep this country from getting any worse; don't let Donald Trump in the White House. Make sure you get out and vote! Personally, I don't care if you write in Mickey Mouse when you go to the polls, just VOTE. Can you imagine what the police departments will be like under a Trump/Republican regime???

DISCLAIMER: All views expressed in this post are those of the author, unless directly attributed to someone else. They do not represent the views of Google or Blogger. 

Saturday, September 17

And Here We Go Again....

It just doesn't seem to end!  Every time  there's another event, I think to myself  "enough is enough, it's got to end now";  but it doesn't end. Not only does another one happen, it's usually one that makes me open my mouth in incredulity at the brutality of it, as well as the stupidity. Sometimes I wonder just what kind of excuse they're going to come up with to try to rationalize their actions , or if they're even going to bother with one at all.  After all, how do you rationalize two officers suddenly just starting to shoot at a man who is sitting at a table eating fried chicken and fries? Even with the "rusty pocket knife" allegedly in his hand, he was sitting,  eating a plate of food! They couldn't have tased him or something? Where was the danger, the threat to their lives?

#DeEscalateDontKill: Black Man Fatally Shot by Florida Cops in His Own Backyard

In the last year, there has been a hashtag directed towards law enforcement all over the nation: #DeEscalateDontKill.
But the police in Broward County, Fla., must have missed the memo.
The Broward Palm Beach New Times reports that police responded to a domestic disturbance call on Friday night and shot and killed a man who was holding a pocket knife—a “rusty pocket knife”—in his own backyard.

The tragedy was set in motion at about 10 p.m. after Gregory Frazier’s sister called 911 because he was arguing with his niece.
By the time police arrived, Frazier, 56, was planted in the backyard of his Pompano Beach home eating chicken wings and fries with a small Swiss Army-style pocket knife in his hand.
The outlet reports that Frazier’s nephew, Quartaze Woodard, says three deputies showed up and told Frazier to get down on the ground. Frazier responded, “Leave me alone.” The deputies repeated the order. Again, Frazier asked them to leave him alone.
Moments later—not one, but two—deputies from the Broward County Sheriff’s Office opened fire. The New Times reports that neighbors say Frazier was hit between five and six times in the back.
Then, after handcuffing him, and removing the handcuffs once they realized he was non-responsive, police attempted to perform CPR. But it was too late.
As per departmental policy, the deputies were placed on paid administrative leave.
“Yes, he had a pocket knife. A rusty pocket knife,” said sister Deborah Frazier to the Miami Herald. “I believe those three cops could have sat down, talked to him, used Tasers, anything, to constrain him.”
She added to the New Times, “I never would have called the cops if I’d known this was going to happen. They just came in and started shooting right away.”
Read more at the Broward Palm Beach New Times and the Miami Herald.

Saturday, September 3

Is There Anyone Who Can Honestly Say They Are Surprised?

I would like to hear from one person who can say honestly that they are surprised by this, who did not already know that if we heard anything at all about this case after the initial flurry of headlines, it would not be what we wanted to hear.

Personally, I am sick to my stomach; I want to cry, I want to rant, I want to blindly run outside and scream at the top of my lungs at how damn unfair it all is. I'm just so tired of this! They beat us up, they kill us, they run roughshod over our rights, our families, even our children, and nothing happens.

 You know the saying that everything goes full circle?(i.e. clothing fashions like bell-bottom pants came back in style, haircuts that were once laughable are now worn proudly) Well, think about it, a few hundred years ago black people were treated like something white people scraped off their shoes after walking through the garden;  how are they treating  black people now? After all the advances this country has made (or we thought had been made) we now find out that we're not really welcome at the table after all.  They're still trying to act like we  don't exist, like we are not people, like black lives don't matter, and if they are confronted with a situation where they have to do something,  what do they do? They go through  a long, drawn-out farce in the judicial system, hoping that they can just ride it out till the furor subsides and everyone has forgotten about it; then they can just  move on, life as usual.  Of course there are those who don't forget, who keep the case alive and in the public eye,  and in those cases what do they do? Read this article:

Ex-S.C. Cop Who Hurled Black Student Over Desk Won’t Face Criminal Charges

A report released on Friday noted that the officer’s behavior looked “worse in the video than it did in the classroom.

The South Carolina police officer who was fired for violently dragging a young black girl across a classroom over use of a cell phone will not face criminal charges.
The New York Daily News reports that Richland County Solicitor Dan Johnson said in a 12-page court report Friday that he found no probable cause to charge the school resource officer in the dragging incident that sparked national outrage.
The report also notes that a witness statement saying the violent altercation between former Richland County police officer Ben Fields and a Spring Valley high school student “looked worse in the video than it did in the classroom.”

To the rest of us, the October video clearly shows that after the student refused to surrender her phone, Fields assaulted her. He wrapped his forearm around her neck, then flipped her and her desk backwards before dragging her along the classroom floor while keeping her in a tight headlock. Fields then cuffed the student as her classmates cried in horror.
Many across the country were besides themselves in anger, especially in light of another incident caught on video showing an officer throwing a young black girl in a swimsuit thrown down to the ground in Texas, more evidence of the violence that young people of color—girls, too—are regularly subjected to (that officer did not face charges either.)
Fields had no regrets about his actions, according to his statement in the report.
“I realized that I was going to have to physically remove the student from her seat to effectuate her arrest,” he said, adding that the desk only flipped over because the student locked her legs inside it.
Fields’ supervisor, Sheriff Leon Lott —said he wanted to “throw up” upon seeing the video —and fired Fields immediately.
Yet Johnson said Lott’s actions were hasty and may have hampered the case against Fields.
“These administrative actions, taken prior to the completion of the investigation, have been injurious to the prosecution of the case,” Johnson said in the report (which leads one to believe that if the Sheriff didn’t take that action, Fields would still have a job in addition to no criminal charges.)
To add insult to injury, the girl who recorded the video, Niya Kenny, was also arrested after questioning Fields’ conduct.
Kenny and the student who was assaulted were charged with “disturbing schools” charges, which parents protested at the time.
Johnson noted that the charges against both students would be dropped as well.